Frightening thought
IT IS most frightening to read Roger Khan's statement in Stabroek News dated May 11, 2006 with regard to the political struggle in Guyana.

A vast majority of Guyanese would tend to believe what Roger Khan had to say about a conspiracy regarding some sections of the GDF/GPF and the U.S. to hand power to the PNCR once again.

The U.S. handed power to the PNCR before and they will not hesitate to do it again for no apparent reason.

The entire world community knew that it was the U.S. that placed the PNCR in power illegally and kept it there for 28 years.

Guyanese knew all too well the tremendous suffering and hardship they faced during those 28 years of illegal dictatorship. Would the U.S. want to do this to Guyanese again? I and many Guyanese do hope not.

But questions must be asked about why the silent treatment from the U.S. on some urgent matters.

The U.S. remained very silent with all the PNCR antics of trying to bring this democratically elected government down with frivolous claims on the coming general elections.

The U.S. would not sanction or even warn the PNCR about its actions.

The U.S. never once said a word when the late leader of the PNCR said words like "it will it will apply slow fire more fire" to this democratically government to bring it down.

The U.S. remained silent when the leader of the PNCR said it does not matter how it gains power -- "back door or trap door".

The U.S. remained silent when the leader of the PNCR said it will do everything in its power "to make this country ungovernable".

The U.S. and the entire international community stayed silent on those threats made by PNCR leaders. The majority of Guyanese termed these PNCR threats as terror.

Why did the U.S. and the international community remain silent on these PNCR terror threats to this nation? 

Aren't those words of terrorism to the majority of people of this country?

The entire world knew the Pakistani President was never elected to office but remains a strong ally of the U.S. on fighting terrorists.

I do not agree with the U.S. on this because it was Pakistan which created the mess in Afghanistan in the first place.

Palestinians voted overwhelmingly in a free/fair/transparent and non-violent election but the U.S. will not recognize it for it is branded a terrorist organization.

I agree with the U.S. that Hamas must denounce violence before acting like an elected government.

A duly democratically President was removed from office in Haiti by the U.S. I do not agree with the U.S. on this.

The U.S. revoked the visa of Guyana's Minister of Home Affairs even though he was cleared of all wrongdoing. I did not and will never agree with the U.S. on this, simply because the U.S. was fed a pack of lies by the PNCR and their allies.

The U.S. gave the PNCR the tools to pressure the government causing the minister to resign.

Based on the above actions of U.S. foreign policy lately, it would be no surprise to see the PNCR back in power without winning an election in Guyana -- this is a frightening thought for all Guyanese.

The U.S. and the international community know that in any free fair and transparent elections the PNCR will not win.

All the talk about race-based politics, and how the Indians vote for the PPP/C and the Blacks vote for the PNCR, is a bundle of trash.

If anyone or any country does not want race-based politics or race-based voting taking place in any country, then South Africa must have White rule again.

Would the U.S. and the rest of the international community and the PNCR accept White rule in South Africa again?

Case closed on race-based voting period.

I ask the U.S. not to listen to the lies and cries of the PNCR and their allies about young Black youths being discriminated against and disenfranchised without facts.

The facts will show that the majority of youths in Guyana are Indians who are unemployed but it is expected that their parents must take care of them.

The Guyanese nation asks the U.S. not to make the same mistake it made for 28 years to the majority of peace loving and law abiding Guyanese citizens.
T. KING

Monday, May 15, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

I do believe Roger Khan's statement also - Sutley