Frightening
thought
IT
IS most frightening to read Roger Khan's statement in Stabroek News
dated May 11, 2006
with regard to the political struggle in Guyana.
A
vast majority of Guyanese would tend to believe what Roger Khan had
to say about a conspiracy regarding some sections of the GDF/GPF
and the U.S. to hand power to the PNCR once again.
The
U.S. handed power to the PNCR before and they will not
hesitate to do it again for no apparent reason.
The
entire world community knew that it was the U.S. that placed the
PNCR in power illegally and kept it there for 28 years.
Guyanese knew
all too well the tremendous suffering and hardship they
faced during those 28 years of illegal dictatorship. Would
the U.S. want to do this to Guyanese again? I and
many Guyanese do hope not.
But
questions must be asked about why the silent treatment from the U.S.
on some urgent matters.
The
U.S. remained very silent with all the PNCR antics of
trying to bring this democratically elected government down
with frivolous claims on the coming general elections.
The
U.S. would not sanction or even warn the PNCR about its actions.
The
U.S. never once said a word when the late leader of the
PNCR said words like "it will it will apply slow fire more
fire" to this democratically government to bring it down.
The
U.S. remained silent when the leader of the PNCR said it does
not matter how it gains power -- "back door or trap
door".
The
U.S. remained silent when the leader of the PNCR said it will
do everything in its power "to make this country
ungovernable".
The
U.S. and the entire international community stayed silent on
those threats made by PNCR leaders. The majority of
Guyanese termed these PNCR threats as terror.
Why
did the U.S. and the international community remain silent on these
PNCR terror threats to this nation?
Aren't
those words of terrorism to the majority of people of this
country?
The
entire world knew the Pakistani President was never elected to
office but remains a strong ally of the U.S. on fighting
terrorists.
I
do not agree with the U.S. on this because it was Pakistan
which created the mess in Afghanistan in the first place.
Palestinians
voted overwhelmingly in a free/fair/transparent and non-violent
election but the U.S. will not recognize it for it is branded a
terrorist organization.
I
agree with the U.S. that Hamas must denounce violence before acting
like an elected government.
A
duly democratically President was removed from office in Haiti by
the U.S. I do not agree with the U.S. on this.
The
U.S. revoked the visa of Guyana's Minister of Home Affairs even
though he was cleared of all wrongdoing. I did not and will never
agree with the U.S. on this, simply because the U.S. was fed a pack
of lies by the PNCR and their allies.
The
U.S. gave the PNCR the tools to pressure the government causing the
minister to resign.
Based
on the above actions of U.S. foreign policy lately, it would be
no surprise to see the PNCR back in power without winning an
election in Guyana -- this is a frightening thought for all Guyanese.
The
U.S. and the international community know that in any free fair and
transparent elections the PNCR will not win.
All
the talk about race-based politics, and how the Indians vote for the
PPP/C and the Blacks vote for the PNCR, is a bundle of trash.
If
anyone or any country does not want race-based politics or
race-based voting taking place in any country, then South
Africa must have White rule again.
Would
the U.S. and the rest of the international community and the PNCR
accept White rule in South Africa again?
Case
closed on race-based voting period.
I
ask the U.S. not to listen to the lies and cries of the PNCR and
their allies about young Black youths being discriminated against
and disenfranchised without facts.
The
facts will show that the majority of youths in Guyana are Indians
who are unemployed but it is expected that their parents must take
care of them.
The
Guyanese nation asks the U.S. not to make the same mistake it made
for 28 years to the majority of peace loving and law abiding
Guyanese citizens.
T. KING
Monday,
May 15, 2006 |